> No filters
No improvements
Don't mean to be disrespectful but this is a good way to waste resources...
> without compromising quality
Do u even take a look at the comp?
> Don’t mean to be disrespectful but this is a good way to waste resources…
What that supposed to mean? You're a fan of filtered and super fast profile encodes with crf 24 or something? ^^
> Do u even take a look at the comp?
Yeah, with 200% zoom, to make sure the preserved noise is still mostly there and is noisy... ;)
Do u even know what is the purpose of filtering? Super fast preset is not the same as filtering... Ffs go read more about x265 pls... Quoting my wasting resources is about this shit has no improvement of the remux itself. And now u are talking about crf? Preserved noise? U are creating more artifacts with ur crf 19 and u called that preserving noise? I don't even have to zoom to see what's wrong with ur encodes (from ur comp of course). Not sure what u seen with 200% zoom kek... Sigh... Why did I even bother to comment more... Ciao...
Edit: At this point even moozzi2 is better than urs.
The IT BD screenshots in the comparison are not captured correctly; don't run a deinterlacer on the scenes that are encoded in progressive with soft-pulldown.
> Do u even know what is the purpose of filtering? Super fast preset is not the same as filtering… Ffs go read more about x265 pls… Quoting my wasting resources is about this shit has no improvement of the remux itself. And now u are talking about crf? Preserved noise? U are creating more artifacts with ur crf 19 and u called that preserving noise? I don’t even have to zoom to see what’s wrong with ur encodes (from ur comp of course). Not sure what u seen with 200% zoom kek… Sigh… Why did I even bother to comment more… Ciao…
>Edit: At this point even moozzi2 is better than urs.
Thanks for being an asshole for no reason!
If you don't like mine, there's still 170gb remux... Maybe it will have more details preserved for your pleasure...
The only purpose of filtering is to make plebs happy ;)
What to do when you see filtered crap? - Avoid ;)
> The IT BD screenshots in the comparison are not captured correctly; don’t run a deinterlacer on the scenes that are encoded in progressive with soft-pulldown.
You right... no wonder some bd screens look less sharp... Annoying, but not that critical ^^ Not sure i can do anything about it now, sorry :(
> why opus?
i heard its so amazingly good at compressing, no-one cant tell any difference ;)
> You could make it smaller though, 60gb is still big.
Nah, not with all that constant full screen grain\noise…
Might have been 5 times smaller if denoised completely ^^
> Hate filters and all that crap… You could make it smaller though, 60gb is still big.
I guess this is very sarcastic, from the highest level. This is a lot of fun with some meaning inside. I love it.
Comments - 11
seth001
MrBug (uploader)
seth001
scav
Lily-white
MrBug (uploader)
Kogarou
MrBug (uploader)
aerdemd
MrBug (uploader)
golgoth-13