/!\ this is a WEBRip (re-encoded, poor quality) Use the loroid rip if you want the same thing but with good quality (https://nyaa.iss.one/view/1804053)

@NanDesuKa You should read the site rule if you're going to keep posting this to a particular uploader.

@pyaripyo What rule am I breaking? No rule. I'm just stating a fact. These releases should even be in red and they're not.

Well, not from first place but recently you posting similar claim about quality and indirectly mentioning every one that we shouldn't download this guy's post. I downloaded but I see nothing wrong or have any stress watching. You're saying It's a fact, but have you confirmed it is or just assuming because it was uploaded by New-Raws?? You're the only one that keeps claiming for every post. If you can't prove then this can possibly consider shitposting. Do I make myself clear?

I can easily prove this by comparing StreamFab's rip and its releases. And as the StreamFab forum points out, NF and even AMZN are re-encoded. (https://forum.dvdfab.cn/forum/software-support-english/youtube-to-mp3-youtube-video-downloader/439189-test-version-for-amazon-and-netflix-re-encoding-mode-march-15-2024). Once again, just because you can't see it doesn't mean it isn't the case. You only need to look at mediainfos to see that it's not an original Netflix file. And there's no indication in the release that it's a re-encode. If you simply want to compare a real untouched release with an AMZN release from loroid, varyg or even NanDesuKa, compare it with this one from New-Raws and you'll see for yourself.

You're going way too detailed on that. It's totally up to the uploader how they post their stuff. Good quality, bad quality, original or copy from one another. If you don't like it, simply ignore them. You don't have to keep on stalking and saying things like that.

That's not true, we should all be aware of what we post and respect certain rules. Just because you're on nyaa doesn't mean you can post anything and everything. Here he's posting a WEBRip, so the least he can do is say so. First of all, it avoids getting the community to download nonsense, and secondly, it avoids destroying the stats of other people who take their time and money to offer a real release. As for me, I couldn't care less, but I think it's a general disrespect towards all the rippers who are bored with untouched releases. And I'm taking the liberty of commenting and saying it loud and clear, because it's important to know that we're not the only ones to think this and to have made the remark (on discord or even on nyaa). Besides, if everyone did as he did and didn't indicate WEBRip or WEB-DL, do you think nyaa would still be as cool to use? No. There are other uploaders who offer WEBRip and it poses no problem, because they have the respect to indicate it, whether in the title of the torrent or in the description. Again, if he only did WEBRip, OK that wouldn't be a problem, but he mixes WEB-DL and WEBRip and you can't find your way around nyaa afterwards. Moreover, it should be noted that at one time New-Raws did real WEB-DL, and that's no longer the case, although it's not indicated, which is even more disturbing in my view.

Good luck self-proclaimed quality manager.